Saturday, September 16, 2006

We Got Annie

There have been a number of quotable quips by Richards, but this AP article, Former Texas governor Ann Richards dies, has my favorite:

Asked what she might have done differently had she known she was going to be a one-term governor, Richards grinned.

"Oh, I would probably have raised more hell."
Having come up in the bad old days for career women (see here and here), Ann Richards was the kind of feisty role model that I admired and respected -- a sort of Helen Thomas in politics.

Judith Warner, who blogs at the NY Times, provides a fitting eulogy for those times and Ann Richards’s Big Life:
“A woman’s place is in the dome.”

The words today sound archaic, a tinny relic of a distant feminist past. But just 16 years ago, they had bite. They were fun. They triumphantly emblazoned a T-shirt with a picture of the Texas state capitol that Ann Richards held high on the day, in 1990, when she was elected governor.

It was a different time then. Feminism still felt alive. It produced “Backlash.” It gave us Anita Hill. And Hillary (yes – Hillary) and Bill, for that matter, and a whole climate of expectation and excitement and anticipation of change.

It was an era when Anna Quindlen could hear Richards give her famous “silver foot” speech at the 1988 Democratic National Convention and come away feeling “proud as hell to be a woman.” Richards’s life trajectory – she was a former housewife and mother of four whose marriage had foundered when she entered politics – was the kind of story, then, that gave women a thrill. Many women of her generation had late-in-life careers. It felt real. Richards herself was real – as Quindlen put it in her “Life in the 30’s” column, “she was what men sometimes like to call a ‘real woman’ – pretty and dressed up and obviously good fun. And she was what women like to call a real woman, too – smart and not too perfect, a good ol’ girl, not an ice princess. The kind of woman who, just like you, keeps pantyhose with runs, to wear under slacks.”

Richards, looking back at the end of her single term in the governor’s office, talked about the lofty goals that had pushed her into politics, but also took pains to keep it all real. “I did not want my tombstone to read, ‘She kept a really clean house,’ ” she said.

It was an honest and clear-minded thought. An impolitic thought – much like Hillary Clinton’s 1992 admission that she wasn’t much for staying home and baking cookies. Yet, it was the kind of thought that virtually no one – politician or not – is likely to voice today. Not merely because of the immediate fallout that strikes anyone who does not sufficiently genuflect before the altar of Home. But because, I fear, in this generation, women have lost sight of certain simple truths: “a really clean house” (if you clean it yourself) is incompatible with a really big life.

* * * *
Ann Richards, Hillary Clinton – those women of that turbulent, transitional period of the 80’s into the 90’s – had it right. You can’t clean house and make it to “the dome” too. You can’t bake cookies and make it to the Senate. And that’s not just because there isn’t enough time. More profoundly, it’s because it just isn’t human to do all that. With all of our spouting off these days about the glorious variety of women’s Choice, there is one basic choice that we are not humanly able to make: we cannot choose what kind of people we are or what we are driven, drawn, destined to do. The best we can do is be ourselves – and stand up for what it takes to bring our self into being.

I hate to bake cookies. I will never have a neat house. And I am sick and tired of ruining my days – and my family’s for that matter – trying to be someone I am constitutionally incapable of being.

I want to be like Ann Richards, who in the later years of her life freed herself from the need to do things perfectly, relinquished the desire to be all things to all people, and focused, she said in a 2001 interview, on living a life filled with love, fun and work.
And as a final tribute to Ann Richards, a few excepts from Ann Richards on How to Be a Good Republican:
You have to believe that those privileged from birth achieve success all on their own.

You have to believe God hates homosexuality, but loves the death penalty.

You have to be against government interference in business, until your oil company, corporation or Savings and Loan is about to go broke and you beg for a government bail out.

You love Jesus and Jesus loves you and, by the way, Jesus shares your hatred for AIDS victims, homosexuals, and President Clinton.

You have to believe government has nothing to do with providing police protection, national defense, and building roads.

You have to believe a poor, minority student with a disciplinary history and failing grades will be admitted into an elite private school with a $1,000 voucher.

(Photo and Quotes via My Left Wing)

UPDATE: And don't miss Molly Ivins on Remembering Ann Richards.

Friday, September 15, 2006

My Ethnic Friend

I'm sure you remember George Allen of Virginia -- more well known of "Macaca" fame (see here and here).

As a follow up to that, Allen decided to hold an "Ethnic Rally," see So a Hindu, a Christian and a Jew walk into a bar… I guess he wanted to prove once and for all that he can't be prejudiced because has a black friend, and an Indian friend, and an Italian friend, etc.

Stephen Colbert also has many ethnic friends, just like Senator George Allen.



The Suicide of Civilization

This biting, yet insightful piece , Contempt for Life, aptly subtitled "An Absence Of Thinking Is Bush's Real Legacy," by Alan Bisbort, is truly on target:

In the wake of World War I, Albert Schweitzer (1875-1965) wrote, "It is clear now to everyone that the suicide of civilization is in progress." Schweitzer, having spent part of the war in a French internment camp, said that mankind's collective impulse toward self-destruction was the result of "an absence of thinking which is characterized by a contempt for life."

Though he was a Bach scholar, classical organist, author and philosopher, Schweitzer devoted most of his life to running a free hospital in Gabon, in west Africa. What he said was often pessimistic, yet he was no pessimist. . . .

Not much has changed since Schweitzer's time. As individuals, we all want a safer, cleaner, less violent world. We all prefer to think we adhere to Schweitzer's ethic of "reverence for life" and that we are "civilized."

But, collectively, humankind behaves in the opposite manner. It's as if our species was born with the seed of insanity in our DNA, doing things guaranteed to cause harm to other species and each other, seeming to delight in inflicting pain.

Because it's so easy to mouth platitudes like "pro-life" or "compassionate conservative," language itself is a victim of this suicide. Jettisoning the sole means by which we communicate is to collectively step into a black abyss where everything is relative, where hate and love are the same and "reverence" could really mean "contempt."

Enter George W. Bush. Once upon a time in a sleepy nation, many folks felt that he was the sort of guy they'd love to have a beer with, to sit next to on a bar stool and shoot the breeze. What better qualification for president! What harm could such a man do? Even those who voted for Gore began to say things like, "How bad can four years be?"

Well, we're going on six years now and things are far worse than even the most pessimistic of projections in 2001. It's so bad that Bush is no longer even a laughing stock, with his infantile mispronunciations and desperate grasps at Christian pieties. He is simply impossible to watch or hear. His entire being is a mockery of our best instincts, a daily reminder that buried under the pretence at "reverence" is this seed for "contempt."

* * * *
My favorite was George's telling Katie Couric last week, "One of the hardest parts of my job is to connect Iraq to the war on terror." Lying must be such hard work.

Contemptible is the only word that works for me.
Contemptible works for me as well. Bisbort's characterization is absolutely correct that the continual use of the propaganda technique of "up is down" by Bush and his cronies has made a mockery of our government -- and of us. Schweitzer's words -- "It is clear now to everyone that the suicide of civilization is in progress" -- should instill real fear in us, not the fear-mongering of the Bush boys.

(Via ThomasMc)

Cartoon of the Day

* Matt Davies

Thursday, September 14, 2006

Here's That Rainy Day



I wanted to end the (rainy) day with some music. This is a musical tribute to Johnny Carson, which features Johnny's favorite ballad, "Here's That Rainy Day" as performed by Doc Severinsen, Tommy Newsom, Ed Shaughnessy, backed up by Paul Shaffer and the CBS Orchestra.

Enjoy -- Here's to Johnny!

Blog on

Wired News has the ultimate post in honor on my blogiversary, The Ultimate Blog Post:

While blogging has only reached prominence in the last few years, it was actually invented by the ancient Romans who built a majestic blog in 200 BC from marble, granite and links they stole from the Greeks.

"Blog" itself is short for "weblog," which is short for "we blog because we weren't very popular in high school and we're trying to gain respect and admiration without actually having to be around people."

Creating your own blog is about as easy as creating your own urine, and you're about as likely to find someone else interested in it. One popular technique for building readership is to send e-mail to more well-trafficked blogs offering to exchange links with them. One popular response from those blogs is to laugh derisively and hit the Delete button.

Another approach for advertising your blog is to mention it as much as possible in conversation; you'd be surprised how many people are fascinated to hear you have a blog and want to know more, especially if you were expecting the number to be greater than zero.

However, there are many popular blogs already in existence, and if you want people to think you're cool, you're probably better off claiming you were a "guest blogger" for one of them. Your average blog has so many guest bloggers and such a crappy search feature that nobody will ever be able to prove you wrong.
The author is described as: "Born helpless, nude and unable to provide for himself, Lore Sjöberg eventually overcame these handicaps to become a handyman, a handicapper and a handmaiden."

Obviously, he was born to blog. As was I.

(Via Blinq, A History of Blogs)

Tags:

Cartoon of the Day


* Joseph Farris

The Rule of Incontinent Conservatism

Humorist and former Bush I speechwriter Christopher Buckley has called for a time out for the Republican Party, in this Washington Monthly Commentary, Let’s quit while we’re behind:

“The trouble with our times,” Paul Valéry said, “is that the future is not what it used to be.”

This glum aperçu has been much with me as we move into the home stretch of the 2006 mid-term elections and shimmy into the starting gates of the 2008 presidential campaign. With heavy heart, as a once-proud—indeed, staunch— Republican, I here admit, behind enemy lines, to the guilty hope that my party loses; on both occasions.

I voted for George W. Bush in 2000. In 2004, I could not bring myself to pull the same lever again. Neither could I bring myself to vote for John Kerry, who, for all his strengths, credentials, and talent, seems very much less than the sum of his parts. So, I wrote in a vote for George Herbert Walker Bush . . . .

* * * *
There were some of us who scratched our heads in 2000 when we first heard the phrase “compassionate conservative.” It had a cobbled-together, tautological, dare I say, Rovian aroma to it. But OK, we thought, let’s give it a chance. . . . Who knew, in 2000, that “compassionate conservatism” meant bigger government, unrestricted government spending, government intrusion in personal matters, government ineptitude, and cronyism in disaster relief? Who knew, in 2000, that the only bill the president would veto, six years later, would be one on funding stem-cell research?

A more accurate term for Mr. Bush’s political philosophy might be incontinent conservatism.

* * * *
The Republican Party I grew up into—Dwight D. Eisenhower, William F. Buckley Jr., Barry Goldwater, Richard Nixon (sigh), Ronald Reagan—stood for certain things. It did not always live up to its ideals. Au contraire, as we Republicans said in the pre-Dominique de Villepin era—often, it fell flat on its face. A self-proclaimed “conservative,” Nixon kept the Great Society entitlement beast fat and happy and brought in wage and price controls. Reagan funked Social Security reform in 1983 and raised (lesser) taxes three times. He vowed to balance the budget, and drove the deficit to historic highs by failing to rein in government spending. Someone called it “Voodoo economics.” You could Google it.

There were foreign misadventures, terrible ones: Vietnam (the ’69-’75 chapters), Beirut, Iran-Contra, the Saddam Hussein tilt. But there were compensating triumphs: Eisenhower’s refusal to bail out France in Indochina in 1954, Nixon’s China opening, the Cold War victory.

Despite the failures, one had the sense that the party at least knew in its heart of hearts that these were failures, either of principle or execution. Today one has no sense, aside from a slight lowering of the swagger-mometer, that the president or the Republican Congress is in the least bit chastened by their debacles.

* * * *
What have they done to my party? Where does one go to get it back?
One place comes to mind: the back benches. It’s time for a time-out. Time to hand over this sorry enchilada to Hillary and Nancy Pelosi and Joe Biden and Charlie Rangel and Harry Reid, who has the gift of being able to induce sleep in 30 seconds. Or, with any luck, to Mark Warner or, what the heck, Al Gore. I’m not much into polar bears, but this heat wave has me thinking the man might be on to something.

My fellow Republicans, it is time, as Madison said in Federalist 76, to “Hand over the tiller of governance, that others may fuck things up for a change.”
Now this is a Republican I might even be able to like.

Tags: , ,

Snakes in the White House

In this wonderful article, Snakes on a Plane; Bush in the White House, Zbignew Zingh has expressed -- perfectly -- my view of flying. He explains his fear of flying:

I am more afraid of the reptiles in the Administration than anything Hollywood puts on an airplane. I mean, these are incredibly venomous, cold-blooded creepy-crawlies that are running the United States these days, and unlike a short flight from here to there where, a few hours after take off you leave the plane at your destination, we are doomed in real life to travel with the Buskovites, like slave-rowers chained to the galley, for at least the next several years.

The current hysteria regarding air travel doesn't faze me. I don't like to fly, anyway. It isn't the fear of 'terrorists'. I have always felt discomfited by the cramped, smelly bathrooms with sticky floors and in-folding double-hinged doors; the screaming babies and the screaming jet engines; mysterious things that go “bonk” in the fuselage in mid-flight; passengers with coughs and sneezes whose germs are sucked into and recirculated by poorly oxygenated ventilation systems; the abysmal packages of over-salted stuff they call “food”, whether they give it to you 'for free' or seduce you to buy it. I don't like the on-board movies: I don't want to wear headphones, but I can't stop myself from watching the silent film, usually some insipid comedy about a class of people that I have never met, that possibly no one has ever met. I don't like being crammed into a narrow seat fighting a low-intensity guerrilla war for hours with the stranger seated next to me for a small piece of the armrest. I don't like the feeling of being couped up in a jam-packed flying bus. I get claustrophobic. I want to be able to stop, get out and stretch my legs – open a window, get some fresh air, yell, scream, holler obscenities at the latest outrage of foreign policy and corporate greed. I hate flying.

It's worse now than ever. Homeland Security says that it isn't doing racial profiling. I don't believe them. And even if Homeland Security isn't profiling me, everyone else on the plane is. A Northwest flight from Amsterdam to Mumbai was aborted and returned under fighter jet escort. Twelve “suspicious” looking passengers were arrested and interrogated for the reason that they were bearded, shared a cell phone, spoke Urdu and knew each other. The passengers and crew freaked. The news media freaked. The implication is clear: if you're going to fly, you had better be clean shaved and speak only English. Otherwise, don't speak. Or don't fly.

Today, it is men with beards and mustaches. Tomorrow, it will be women with beards and mustaches. Cell phones today; iPods tomorrow. Worry beads today and rosaries tomorrow. Today it's her burqa; tomorrow it's your yamulke.

I see them all around me: people constantly looking all around themselves like Felix the Cat clocks. Someone's cell phone rings and they run for cover. A bearded man drinks water from a Nalgene bottle in an airport waiting lounge... or is he drinking hydrogen peroxide that he's mixing with naphthalene and other volatile liquids in his bladder? You know, he goes to the restroom, lights a match and unleashes a flamethrower! A woman sits nursing her baby... hmmm, could that kid be a little suicide bomber wrapped in swaddling?

Although Homeland Security denies that it does racial profiling, it does admit that it is doing “behavioral profiling”. It has computer programs and psychological profiles of those who are probably committing thought crime. Apparently, those who are about to kill and maim and criticize American foreign and domestic policy act differently – their hearts beat differently, their eyes get shifty, they get facial ticks and twitches. So says Homeland Security which then proceeds to arrest, harangue and interrogate those who, fancy that, all seem to have dark skin, are of Asian or Middle Eastern ethnicity and have beards or head scarfs. But, they assure us, it's only because of their suspicious behavior not because of their appearances.

I can't fly anymore because I have an active imagination. I routinely commit thought crime. When a restaurant waitress asks me whether “everything is alright”, I am prone to answer No!, How can everything be alright when THEY are getting away with murder! And New Orleans! And Haiti! I can't order food without asking whether the the daily special is Rumsfeld's chopped chicken liver on toast. I cannot help myself because I am impulsive.

I see armed guards at the airport and I start to get twitchy. I get this way not because I have done anything wrong, but because I anticipate that they will. I have read too much about overly aggressive police who Taser folks for “resisting”. I have read too much about flashlight beatings. I know about Chicago. An image of Wounded Knee flashes into my mind. I try to repress thoughts about the CIA disappearing people to secret detention facilities. I think about the Army lowering both its academic and 'moral standards' in order to meet its enlistment quotas. I think about the violence and injustices occurring during the on-going U.S. occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq. Is this what it's like for Iraqi civilians to encounter an American military checkpoint in Baghdad? My heart starts to stutter. My “behavior profile index” starts to score in the Hot Pink to Bright Red category. I feel the security guards staring at me and encircling me. My face begins to twitch like Quasimodo's in The Hunchback of Notre Dame.

I fear that someone might make some casual remark to me that will immediately set off alarm bells. A passenger might remark in some sports fantasy indulgence: “Hey, how about those Yankees, or Rangers, or Dodgers, or whatever?” And I might answer: “Who gives a crap! But what about Israel dropping American cluster-bombs on Lebanon, and what about those Yankees in Iraq?” And that's bound to get a security officer's attention; and when they start looking at me I start looking at them and their guns and stun grenades; and my eyes start to blink fast and little beads of perspiration form on my brow, because I know I am being “behaviorally profiled” which makes my behavior even more nervous, and I know that I am in for a special strip search and interrogation and that everyone will be staring at me like I ought to be booted off the flight even after they find nothing on me.

I cannot fly anymore because I cannot take anything on board with me to read. Sure, Sports Illustrated is okay as is the Bible, Playboy and Soldier of Fortune and any gossip magazine or lurid paperback that you can buy at the concourse stores inside the security cordons. But would I dare take on the flight anything that really stimulated thought or conversation? There is, strictly speaking, no list of banned literature, but can I read the most recent copy of International Socialist Review as the plane taxis down the tarmac, or can I carry in my coat pocket a copy of the Koran, the text of Henry David Thoreau's essay “Civil Disobedience”, or any book written in Arabic or authored by a Mahmood or an Ali or a Hassan? If I kept a laminated copy of the Declaration of Independence on a card in my wallet, sat down in my assigned seat, pulled out the laminated card and read softly aloud: “We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights. That among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights governments are instituted among men deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the People to alter or abolish it and to institute a new government”... would a passenger call an air marshal to apprehend me as a potential terrorist?

For want of having anything decent to read, I have tried twiddling my thumbs on a plane for hours on end. It's no use. Nothing raises the suspicion index like incessant thumb twiddling. Besides, it also gives me repetitive stress disorder of the fingers.

And whenever I think about finger-giving, I think about our President. According to George Bush's press secretary, Tony the Snow Job, the President is reading Albert Camus's existential novel The Stranger this summer. Uh huh, and in between playing rounds of golf next week Mister Bush is also going to read Tolstoy's War and Peace, Gibbons Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, James Joyce's Ulysses, the entire works of William Shakespeare and Thomas Mann's Magic Mountain. This transparent attempt to burnish the President's “intellectual credentials” is as convincing as Mao Zedong's annual photo op swimming in the Yangtze River during last century's Cultural Revolution in China to prove Mao's physical fitness. I certainly don't claim to have Mister Bush's weighty intellect, but what would happen if I sat in the airport waiting room reading not The Stranger like our august President, but The Plague? Would I be treated like I was reading a manual on biowarfare?

I hate to fly. I have begun to suffer from my own form of PTSD: pre traumatic stress disorder. Nothing has happened... yet... but I anticipate that something will happen... to me. I feel myself becoming neurotic about which stranger on the plane is the air marshal and whether they deliberately gave me a seat sandwiched between two beefy gun-toting security guards disguised as “businessmen”. Maybe all the passengers are disguised security guards and I'm the only “regular” passenger? I just hate to fly these days.

Bush is in the White House. Rummy's in the Pentagon. Condy's at Foggy Bottom. Bolton's at the U.N. Rove's slithering as snakes will do. Lord knows where Dick Cheney's hanging out. They and a motley crew of ideologues, demagogues, militarists, religious zealots, jingoists, and moneyed interests are flying this plane, manning the control tower. I am strapped into my seat along with 6.5 billion other passengers. The flight crew scares the pants off me. I don't want to go where we are going. These days, I really hate to fly.

As I've said before, see e.g., Super Fly, that is definitely my mantra -- these days, I really hate to fly!

One of the LWL,* Jennifer, was talking (at lunch, of course) an upcoming trip that involved contact with a dreaded airplane. She should definitely NOT read this article in advance of her flight. She'll never be able to board the plane. Hell, she'll never be able to go to the airport.

* Ladies Who Lunch.

Happy Blogiversary


It's one year ago today that I began TJP.

Time sure blinks by.


In honor of my Blogiversary, here's a classic clip from the Daily Show:
Ted Hitler on Blogging.





Wednesday, September 13, 2006

Tavis Talks

Tavis Smiley
Born: September 13, 1964

~~~~~
“This administration and these folk
who run Washington are no more
interested in our welfare and our well being
than the man on the moon.
And we have got to start
taking our destiny into our hands.”

(Via My Left Wing)

Tuesday, September 12, 2006

Waiting for the Phone to Ring


Deborah Leavy often writes op-ed pieces on various topics for the Philadelphia Daily News. I'm not sure if she really wrote this one, NO VERIZON ON MY HORIZON, or if it was my colleague Karen in disguise.

Karen works from home most of the time. In our business (health law), that's doable -- for most of our work, all you need is a computer, printer, fax/phone and email/Internet. Unfortunately, Karen hasn't had phone/fax (via Verizon) for over a week and hasn't had email/Internet (via Comcast cable) for several days now. She lives on the Main Line and the last few storms have caused outages. That's "act of God" in legalese, but the post-storm delays are pure acts of big business. Verizon and Comcast are the epitome of unconcerned big companies -- monopolies really -- who know you don't have much choice, so can give little or no service, or bad service, without penalty.

When Karen told me that she had to stay home last week for a 12 hour period to wait for the Verizon repairman, I thought that she was kidding (and today is the day that the Comcast repairman is supposed to come during another 12 hour window). When the appointed day arrived, no one showed (if only he could go the way of the Sears washer repairman!).

That must be the Verizon SOP (standard operating procedure):

1st step: Tell customer wait time for repair order is 1 week.

2nd step: Tell customer to stay home all day to wait for repairman.

3rd step: Ignore angry calls to customer service when repairman does not show.

4th step: Reschedule for later in week/next week.

5th step: Start over at step #2.

Leavy's experience was identical. As she states:

I WASN'T GOING to write a column this week. Our son's weeklong visit with friends down the shore would be giving my husband and me some time for ourselves, a little vacation.

But instead of driving up to Bucks County for the day, or even going out to lunch with my hubby, I'm spending at least some of that time waiting for the Verizon guy to show up.

It happens to everyone. And if it's not the phone, it's the refrigerator, or the toilet, or you need the exterminator. If you don't live in an apartment with an extremely nice super, you're stuck waiting, and probably have to take a day off from work.

Maybe you're lucky and people show up when they're supposed to. But probably not. Or they don't have the right part and have to come back, and we have to wait all over again.

When the phone went out a week ago Friday, they said it couldn't be fixed until the following Tuesday . . . .

But before long it was Monday, and I got an automated call telling me the repair would be done the next day between 8 a.m. and 7 p.m., and I should be home all that time. I was. Home. All. That. Time. Do I have to tell you that nobody showed up?

After 7 came and went, I called four times, and each time had to listen to the cheery voice telling me that Verizon is committed to giving each person the best possible customer service.

* * * *

But I don't understand why if someone fails to show up for an appointment on Tuesday, I can't get rescheduled until Thursday - a week without phone service. None of the four "customer service representatives" I spoke to would explain it, nor would they change it.

For more than an hour, I was put on hold, told that I could speak with a supervisor, disconnected three times, told there was no supervisor on duty, or that one would call me back. When would that be? Between 10 p.m. and midnight! Not to worry - of course, no one called.

No one showed up on Thursday, when it was my husband's turn to wait. He called and was told we had been rescheduled for the Tuesday after Labor Day - today, 10 days after we reported the problem.

So why is it that we have to endure minor (and sometimes major) inconveniences from companies whose goods and services we are willing to pay for - or sometimes have already paid for?

WHY DO WE have to spend hours on the phone listening to automated menus and responding to them like pigeons pecking for food?

We have to be on time for our jobs and appointments - why don't these companies have any responsibility, or consequences, when they screw up?

The answer is the bottom line - fewer people to answer the phones, drive the trucks and make the repairs means more profits for business owners, who increasingly are anonymous shareholders without a personal relationship with customers.

There are people in our communities wanting jobs, and plenty of jobs to be done, but if a company can squeeze by with 10 more minutes of hold time for customers and make a penny, they'll do it.

As I always say in this situation, if I provided this kind of service (or lack of service), I'd be out of business. Of course, that's just what you'd like to say -- I'll take my business elsewhere. But, there is no elsewhere.

(Photo: Waiting for the phone to ring by Gina Rothfels)

I've Been Here Too Long

Daniel Rubin of Blinq probes the question of "How Philly are You" in Please Pass The Swiss, with an assortment of quizes (he's more Philly than I am, but not by much).

They are all fun (and funny). A few of my favorites, from You know you're from Philadelphia if ...

  • The first day of buck and the first day of doe season are school holidays.
  • You can use the phrase "fire hall wedding reception" and not even bat an eye.
  • You can't go to a wedding without hearing the "Chicken Dance," at least 1 Polka and either an Italian song (sung in Italian,) or "Hava Nagila."
  • At least 5 people on your block have electric "candles" in all or most of their windows all year long.
  • You know what a "Hex sign" is.
  • You know what a "State Store" is, and your out of state friends find it incredulous that you can't purchase liquor at the mini-mart.
  • You know what a township, borough, and commonwealth is.
  • You can identify drivers from New York, New Jersey, Ohio,or other neighboring states by their unique and irritating driving habits.
  • A traffic jam is ten cars waiting to pass a horse-drawn carriage on the highway in Lancaster County.
  • You know several people who have hit deer more than once.
  • You learned to pronounce Bryn Mawr, Wilkes-Barre, Schuylkill, Bala Cynwyd, Conshohocken, and Monongahela.


  • And then there the "Test" --

    You are 81% Philly!!

    You've got a lot of Philly flare in you! You s hould be pround. Just don't let people confuse you with a New Yorker or a Jersey head!

    How Philly Are You?
    Make a Quiz



    Now and Then







    Jon Stewart on 9/11 --



    now and then.

    Senior White House Correspondent John Oliver:
    George W. Bush in the right man to lead us in the era of post-whatever horrible calamity he leads us into next.



    The Promise Unfulfilled



    Keith Olbermann has a 9/11 Special Comment, "This Hole in the Ground," on his Countdown Program that is another powerful Commentary on Bush (Crooks & Liars has the video and full transcript). A few excerpts:

    And anyone who claims that I and others like me are "soft", or have "forgotten" the lessons of what happened here — is at best a grasping, opportunistic, dilettante — and at worst, an idiot — whether he is a commentator, or a Vice President, or a President.
    However. Of all the things those of us who were here five years ago could have forecast — of all the nightmares that unfolded before our eyes, and the others that unfolded only in our minds… none of us could have predicted… this.
    Five years later this space… is still empty.
    Five years later there is no Memorial to the dead.
    Five years later there is no building rising to show with proud defiance that we would not have our America wrung from us, by cowards and criminals.
    Five years later this country’s wound is still open.
    Five years… later this country’s mass grave is still unmarked.
    Five years later… this is still… just a background for a photo-op.
    It is beyond shameful.
    * * * *
    When those who dissent are told time and time again — as we will be, if not tonight by the President, then tomorrow by his portable public chorus — that he is preserving our freedom, but that if we use any of it, we are somehow un-American…
    When we are scolded, that if we merely question, we have "forgotten the lessons of 9/11"… look into this empty space behind me and the bi-partisanship upon which this administration also did not build, and tell me:
    Who has left this hole in the ground?
    We have not forgotten, Mr. President.
    You have.
    May this country forgive you.

    ----
    "The tools of conquest do not necessarily come with bombs and explosions and fallout. There are weapons that are simply thoughts, attitudes, prejudices - to be found only in the minds of men.

    "For the record, prejudices can kill and suspicion can destroy, and a thoughtless, frightened search for a scapegoat has a fallout all its own — for the children, and the children yet unborn."

    --Rod Sterling, The Twilight Zone

    Monday, September 11, 2006

    Life Goes On

    At the close of the day, the words of Garrison Keillor, Our magnificent isolation, from Salon, resonate:

    Growing up in the '50s, we imagined our country defended by guided missiles poised in bunkers, jet fighters on the tarmac and pilots in the ready room prepared to scramble, a colonel with a black briefcase sitting in the hall outside the president's bedroom. But Sept. 11 gave us a clearer picture.

    * * * *
    So America is not the secure fortress we grew up imagining. Perhaps it never was. What protects us is what has protected us for 230 years: our magnificent isolation. After the disasters of the 20th century, Europe put nationalism aside and adopted civilization, but we have oceans on either side, so if the president turns out to be a shallow jingoistic fool with a small rigid agenda and little knowledge of the world, we expect to survive it somehow. Life goes on.

    It's hard for Americans to visualize the collapse of our country. It's as unthinkable as one's own demise.

    * * * *
    You might think from the latest broadsides that the republic is teetering, that it's Munich again, the Nazis are on the loose, and the Current Occupant is Winston Churchill, and that to question him is treachery. The fury of the right wing is quite remarkable -- to maintain a sense of persecution after years of being in power is like Donald Trump feeling overlooked -- but life goes on.

    We really are one people at heart. We all believe that when thousands of people are trapped in the Superdome without food or water, it is the duty of government, the federal government if necessary, to come to their rescue and to restore them to the civil mean and not abandon them to fate. Right there is the basis of liberalism. Conservatives tried to introduce a new idea -- it's your fault if you get caught in a storm -- and this idea was rejected by nine out of 10 people once they saw the pictures.

    * * * *
    I don't get much hope from Democrats these days, a timid and skittish bunch, slow to learn, unable to sing the hymns and express the steady optimism that is at the heart of the heart of the country. I get no hope at all from Republicans, whose policies seem predicated on the Second Coming occurring in the very near future. If Jesus does not descend through the clouds to take them directly to paradise, and do it now, they are going to have to answer to the rest of us. (Emphasis added)

    Cartoon of the Day

    * John Sherffius

    Remembrance of Things Lost


    As I reflect on the days and years that have passed since 9/11, sadness is the overriding emotion that remains. Sadness for the people lost that day and the grief of their families. Sadness as well for us all -- for the lost opportunities arising from that time. After we were attacked, the country was united, and the world was united, in support of our country.

    For a time, I believed that out of the devastation, the country would be united for the common good. But now I realize how naive that was. The party in power remains focused on keeping the Party united (the Republican Party, that is), not the country. This is an Administration that rules solely by politics, so a united America would be contrary to its interests. Ex-White House official, John DiIlulio's words, in Ron Suskind January 2003 article, in Why Are These Men Laughing? still describes it best:

    "There is no precedent in any modern White House for what is going on in this one: a complete lack of a policy apparatus," says DiIulio. "What you’ve got is everything—and I mean everything—being run by the political arm. It’s the reign of the Mayberry Machiavellis."
    That may, in fact, be the biggest failure (out of many) that will be the legacy of the Bush Administration. To have squandered the goodwill of its people and many in the world in support of its own policial agenda, to have co-opted 9/11 for partisan political purposes, which has furthered the extreme divisions in the country (and the rest of the world) perpetrated by the Republican party.

    In fact, whenever I hear the words "9/11" today, my first reaction is that I assume that the Republican party is about to use the term as a slogan, a propaganda tool, to instill fear for political purposes. It has nothing to do with what happened that day.

    To some extent, because Bush has peverted the meaning of "9/11," for many in this country, we have become like those people pictured above, chatting in the distance of the burning towers. Frank Rich also explores this topic in his NY Times piece, Whatever Happened to the America of 9/12? Describing the shot, he says:
    Seen from the perspective of 9/11’s fifth anniversary, Mr. Hoepker’s photo is prescient as well as important — a snapshot of history soon to come. What he caught was this: Traumatic as the attack on America was, 9/11 would recede quickly for many. This is a country that likes to move on, and fast. The young people in Mr. Hoepker’s photo aren’t necessarily callous. They’re just American. In the five years since the attacks, the ability of Americans to dust themselves off and keep going explains both what’s gone right and what’s gone wrong on our path to the divided and dispirited state the nation finds itself in today.

    What’s gone right: the terrorists failed to break America’s back. The “new” normal lasted about 10 minutes, except at airport check-ins. The economy, for all its dips and inequities and runaway debt, was not destroyed. The culture, for better and worse, survived intact.

    * * * *
    But even as we celebrate this resilience, it too comes at a price. The companion American trait to resilience is forgetfulness. What we’ve forgotten too quickly is the outpouring of affection and unity that swelled against all odds in the wake of Al Qaeda’s act of mass murder. If you were in New York then, you saw it in the streets, and not just at ground zero, where countless thousands of good Samaritans joined the official responders and caregivers to help, at the cost of their own health. You saw it as New Yorkers of every kind gathered around the spontaneous shrines to the fallen and the missing at police and fire stations, at churches and in parks, to lend solace or a hand. This good feeling quickly spread to Capitol Hill, to red states where New York had once been Sodom incarnate and to the world, the third world included, where America was a nearly uniform object of sympathy and grief.

    * * * *
    The destruction of that unity, both in this nation and in the world, is as much a cause for mourning on the fifth anniversary as the attack itself. As we can’t forget the dead of 9/11, we can’t forget how the only good thing that came out of that horror, that unity, was smothered in its cradle.

    * * * *

    Less than a month after 9/11, the president was making good on his promise of “no sacrifice whatsoever.” Speaking in Washington about how it was “the time to be wise” and “the time to act,” he declared, “We need for there to be more tax cuts.” Before long the G.O.P. would be selling 9/11 photos of the president on Air Force One to campaign donors and the White House would be featuring flag-draped remains of the 9/11 dead in political ads.

    And so here we are five years later. Fearmongering remains unceasing. So do tax cuts. So does the war against a country that did not attack us on 9/11. We have moved on, but no one can argue that we have moved ahead.

    Will Bunch also considers the impact of 9/11, in a piece posted at Attytood, From the Philly streets to the NOLA floodwaters to a Lexington runway, the other legacy of post 9/11 America. In his thoughtful observation is focused on the other legacy of the post-9/11 Bush Administration, he notes:

    As you reflect today on the deadly terrorist attacks that took place on Sept. 11, 2001, and everything that has happened in America and around the world in the five years since then, you probably didn’t think of Philly’s soaring crime rate, or a commercial aviation disaster from human error.

    But maybe you should.

    Because one of the many effects of 9/11 — seldom mentioned — is that when the White House declared a “war on terror” and America made that the No. 1 priority, other issues began to get short shrift, some that had dominated the national agenda during a very different 1990s.

    This Jon Stewart clip is a touching reminder of how far we have strayed from the unity engendered by 9/11. As Norm Jensen of One Good Move says:
    This is Jon Stewart's first show after 9/11. A time when we were united, and we were one. We shared our grief, and the world shared our grief. It was a time when the world also shared our goal to find those who were responsible for the death of our friends, our neighbors, our husbands and wives, and of our brothers and sisters. It started well going after bin Laden, but then our leader stumbled. He lost his focus. He stole our sorrow and turned it to fear. He stole our pride of country and replaced it with hubris. He abandoned the principles that made America great, and replaced it with hate. The day will come when we are once again united as a country. Let this day be a reminder that unity is possible and that hope has not been extinguished.
    As we look back with the towers in the distance, we have lost much since that day. Much more, and in different ways, than we could ever have envisioned.

    (See Rozius for full Frank Rich article)

    (Photo: from Watching the World Change by David Friend)

    Friday, September 08, 2006

    Who's Calling


    Be careful.

    You don't know who may be watching if you click on this link . . .


    (Thanks to Jennifer)

    Thursday, September 07, 2006

    Cartoon of the Day

    * David Horsey, Seattle Post Intelligencer

    Tiny Bubbles



    What's the latest with Love Park? Well, "some totally awesome people did the most totally awesome thing in the history of the world: They poured bubbles in the Love Park fountain."

    That's the word of Daniel McQuade of Philadelphia Will Do, Keep Your Bubbles Back At Home, People. As NBC10 news reports:

    If you walked by Love Park early Monday morning, you might have thought it was snowing.It wasn't snow filling the fountain; it was soapsuds.Farley Joseph told NBC 10 that he spotted two vandals pour a box of detergent into the Love Park fountain. .
    See also, Slideshow. Of course, this being Philly, the City was not pleased:
    The Fairmount Park commissioner isn't laughing either. He said it could cost thousands to cleanup the fountain, a bill that taxpayers will have to pick up.


    As I recall, that was the same reaction when pranksters' put colorized the fountain a few years ago. Now? The City does it:



    (Photo of Love in Pink via Gywnedd)

    One True God




    A Classic Daily Show episode -- Even Stevens, with Stephen Colbert & Steve Carell discussing the One True Religion.

    (Via I’ve Made a Huge Tiny Mistake)

    Wednesday, September 06, 2006

    Cartoon of the Day

    * Ted Rall

    Operation Enduring Terror


    Responding to the Bush Administration's latest (pre-election) series of speeches on terrorism, see Looking to Elections, Bush and Democrats Spar on National Security, Keith Olbermann gave another Special Comment on his Countdown show, “Have you no sense of decency, sir?” (video & transcript), directed at the Terrorist-In-Chief, George Bush. Olbermann said:

    It is to our deep national shame—and ultimately it will be to the President’s deep personal regret—that he has followed his Secretary of Defense down the path of trying to tie those loyal Americans who disagree with his policies—or even question their effectiveness or execution—to the Nazis of the past, and the al Qaeda of the present.

    * * * *

    Whatever the true nature of al Qaeda and other international terrorist threats, to ceaselessly compare them to the Nazi State of Germany serves only to embolden them.

    More over, Mr. Bush, you are accomplishing in part what Osama Bin Laden and others seek—a fearful American populace, easily manipulated, and willing to throw away any measure of restraint, any loyalty to our own ideals and freedoms, for the comforting illusion of safety.

    It thus becomes necessary to remind the President that his administration’s recent Nazi “kick” is an awful and cynical thing.

    And it becomes necessary to reach back into our history, for yet another quote, from yet another time and to ask it of Mr. Bush:

    “Have you no sense of decency, sir?”

    And the answer is?

    (For Olbermann's previous Special Comment on Rumsfeld, see If it Quacks Like a Duck)

    Tuesday, September 05, 2006



    Pennsylvania is well represented in the white supremacist world, see e.g., Raging Racists. With that perspective in mind, it is not surprising that the KKK picked PA for a rally, Klan holds rally at Gettysburg. As the AP reported:

    About 30 Ku Klux Klan members proclaimed hatred for blacks, Jews, gays and Latinos as they stood behind barricades at the Civil War battlefield where Abraham Lincoln delivered the Gettysburg Address.

    Noting the irony, Quaker Agitator, in Klanclowns defile Gettysburg's hallowed ground. remarked:

    But I do find it distressing (and somewhat ironic) that they would choose to assemble at Gettysburg, the "high-water mark" of the Confederacy, the place of the worst three days of conflict ever to occur on American soil, where so many died in the struggle to make their fellow human beings free, a place that many students of American history think of as sacred ground. These people oppose everything that this particular place represents. How sad they chose to spread their filth there.

    Guess they never read this:

    "Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth, upon this continent, a new nation, conceived in liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that "all men are created equal.

    Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived, and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a great battle field of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of it, as a final resting place for those who died here, that the nation might live. This we may, in all propriety do. But, in a larger sense, we can not dedicate -- we can not consecrate -- we can not hallow, this ground -- The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have hallowed it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here; while it can never forget what they did here.

    It is rather for us, the living, we here be dedicated to the great task remaining before us -- that, from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they here, gave the last full measure of devotion -- that we here highly resolve these dead shall not have died in vain; that the nation, shall have a new birth of freedom, and that government of the people by the people for the people, shall not perish from the earth."
    According to AP article: "Several groups counterdemonstrated. Park Service spokeswoman Katy Lawhon said there were no major incidents; one man was cited for entering a restricted area carrying a rainbow flag." Let's be sure we understand this -- it's OK to don a white sheet at the park, but not fly a Rainbow Flag? See also Pam's House Blend (with photo). Her first thought was that this was a "Rove/Mehlman-arranged GOP rally for The Base," mine was that it was a Santorum Fundraiser.

    Finally, for an interesting take on the Klan and Gettysburg, see this post by a philosopher at Gettysburg College, When the Ku Klux Klowns Bring Their Circus to Town.

    Monday, September 04, 2006

    Cartoon of the Day

    * Stuart Carlson

    Your Daddy

    Pennsylvania is home to one of the major contested Senate races in the country. As the LA Times notes, in Pennsylvania: Bellwether for November?:

    Perhaps fittingly for what has become an iconic contest, incumbent Republican Rick Santorum and his Democratic challenger, Bob Casey Jr., will tangle for the first time in a joint interview on national television, on NBC's "Meet the Press."

    * * * *
    [B]oth campaigns recognize that as an incumbent senator from the president's party Santorum's fate is entwined with Bush's standing. The question is whether Casey can capitalize on that connection forcefully enough to keep Santorum from becoming this election's comeback kid.
    As the LA Times observed, Ricky Santorum's favorable numbers are about matched with those of George Bush -- no wonder, he votes the same way as the President 98% of the time. (They are matched in other ways as well. Santorum: “I think he’s been a terrific president, absolutely.”)

    Short version of the debate (with video highlights), via Americablog:
    Santorum called George Bush a "terrific president," admitted to sleeping in Pennsylvania just one month a year, reiterated his support for privatizing Social Security, praised Bush's handling of Iraq and insisted there were WMD in Iraq even though the White House has acknowledged there weren't. Casey laid out a new direction, calling for the Iraqis to take the lead on their own security and detailing specific ways for enhancing the U.S. military. He outlined a plan to balance the budget and spoke about the need for Pennsylvania to have a Senator who will hold George Bush accountable for advancing an ineffective agenda.
    Before the debate, there was alot of concern expressed as to how Casey would fare with Santorum, who is a polished speaker, while Casey has John Kerry disease. In The political perils of sound-bite candor, Dick Polman describes it:
    Casey just tends to meander along, repeating verbose talking points culled from his speeches, and deflecting the thrust of questions in a lulling tone of voice that would best suit a meditation instructor.
    However, Polman did (sort of) declare Casey the non-loser of the debate:
    But from Casey’s perspective, however, this debate was probably a success, because on two key occasions, Santorum – who is, by nature, more glib and outspoken -- uttered two potentially damaging sound bites at his own expense.

    The lesser of the two: “I probably spend maybe a month a year” at his home in Pennsylvania.

    * * * *
    But the more important one-liner, the potential gift to the Casey campaign, was his overall assessment of President Bush.

    Santorum said that of course he and the boss don’t always agree on things – Santorum pointed out today that he still thinks that we have found weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, whereas Bush now says we have not – but the senator was still upbeat about his beleaguered leader. Hence, the debate’s number-one sound bite:

    “I think he’s been a terrific president, absolutely.”

    Santorum’s base probably liked that line; at least he doesn't bob and weave like his challenger. The problem is, statewide polls indicate that seven in 10 Pennsylvanians certainly don't view Bush as terrific, at least not in the positive sense.
    Others seemed to give it to Casey. See, e.g., Casey Cool and Collected: Santorum Angry, and Quotes from Sunday's day of debate in Senate race.

    Low point of the debate -- Santorum raising Casey's father during a debate on the morning after pill -- as part of an exchange over the FDA's decision to make the morning-after pill available without a prescription. As the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Heated Senate debate breaks little new ground, explained:

    While both candidates hold generally conservative views on abortion, they showed a sharp disagreement on the federal government's recent decision to allow over-the-counter sales of the so-called Plan B morning-after pill.

    Endorsing the decision, Mr. Casey said, "It is contraception, and I support it, and it's a difference of opinion."

    Mr. Santorum called the pill dangerous, arguing that, "if the egg has been fertilized ... and the pill is taken, it does cause an abortion. It's inconsistent with his previous position. It's a classic attempt of him, how in a general election, to try and middle and, and, and violate his principles."

    Referring to Mr. Casey's father, the late governor known for his anti-abortion views, Mr. Santorum added, "I think his father would be very upset if, if he were alive today and, and heard him be supportive of something like this."

    Asked about that statement in the studio afterwards, Mr. Casey said, "The last thing we need is a lecture from Mr. Santorum about my father."

    See, Media Matters, Santorum Tells Casey His Dead Father ‘Would Be Very Upset’ With Him, which has a video clip of Santorum's exchange. (See also, Debate Coverage).

    UPDATE: The Daily News also has a pretty good recap, Hard to say who won Santorum-Casey debate on national TV.

    The Big Club



    In honor of Labor Day
    George Carlin --
    Who Really Controls America


    Get this video and more at MySpace.com

    Cartoon of the Day

    * Clay Bennett, Christian Science Monitor

    Sunday, September 03, 2006

    Liquidating the Left

    A few months ago, I commented on what trial lawyers used to refer to as the "scorched earth" policy-- that is, winning isn't enough, you must totally and completely destroy the other side. I noted that this seemed to underlie the philosophy of the Republican party in power (see, Scorched Earth).

    NYTimes guest columnist Thomas Frank takes up this same theme in Defunders of Liberty, noting:

    Before he became K Street’s most enterprising racketeer, Jack Abramoff was best known as a sort of young Robespierre of the Reagan Revolution. In 1983, as chairman of the College Republicans, he declared that he and his minions did not “seek peaceful coexistence with the left. Our job is to remove them from power permanently.”

    * * * *
    Abramoff’s remark about liquidating the left was not just the intemperate raving of a hot-blooded youth. It also expressed the essence of the emerging conservative project: You don’t just argue with liberals, you damage them. You use the power of the state to afflict their social movements, to wreck their proudest government agencies, and to divert their funding streams. “Defund the left” was a rallying cry all across the New Right in those heady days; Richard Viguerie even devoted a special issue of Conservative Digest to the subject in 1983.

    Abramoff and his clean-cut campus radicals pushed their own “defund the left” campaign with characteristic élan, declaring war on Ralph Nader’s Public Interest Research Groups, or PIRG, environmental and consumer activist outfits that were funded by student activity fees on some campuses. The young conservatives were always careful to cast the issue as a matter of “student rights” versus political coercion, but Abramoff clearly saw it as an avenue to ideological victory. “When we win this one,” he boasted in 1983, “we’ll have done more to neutralize Ralph Nader than anyone else, ever.”
    A winsome combination -- scorched earth/starve the beast -- to obliterate the opposition forevermore. And the Republican Party has been extremely successful at that. Even as the Republicans are losing favor, the Democratic Party has been so demonized and demoralized that even with the problems within the Republican party, the Democrats are still not ahead.

    (Via Rendezvous with Oblivion -- who has full article available)

    Cartoon of the Day

    * David Horsey, Seattle Post Intelligencer

    Saturday, September 02, 2006

    He's Convertable

    Bill Maher's final new New Rule, "Hello Mullah, Hello Fatwa," is hysterical.

    Maher announces that he is ready to convert to Islam, so he can take hair gel on the plane again. He recommends that we all do. And the best part, as he says, is that nothing that really matters has to change -- it's not like we're asking you to change your email address. We'd be Muslins in name only -- instead of what Americans are now. Christians in name only. Watch the rest . . .


    Coming & Going

    I know that I've ranted on many occasions about the problems experienced when flying "post 9/11" (see, Super Fly). My main gripe is having to deal with the security measures implemented by NSA, which are intended to give maximum hasstle for passengers while conveying a false sense of security.

    Lest one think one's woes are over if you've finally made it to your destination, however, think again -- especially if you've landed in Philly. This Inquirer article, the latest in a series of baggage claim bungles, says it all, Baggage-claim fracas ends in an arrest.

    Here's the short verion via Philadelphia Will Do:

    In a shocker, luggage was delayed at the airport! And the passengers were pissed! And then a fight ensued! Ahh, just another day at Philadelphia International Airport.
    The Inquirer notes that, after a 90-minute wait for luggage, Police were called when someone got angry and belligerent -- this after "[p]assengers said they tried unsuccessfully to get information about the delay from a US Airways baggage-service office next to the luggage carousels."

    Reports vary about whether the 24 year old passenger from California actually did anything to justify the fact that he "ended up on the carousel with officers on top of him." According to a witness (and corroborated by others):
    "They picked him up and threw him on the belt," Audrey Kuhner said. "They picked him up again... and dragged him about 15 feet and then took him out to the car. He had no shirt on. It had been ripped off."
    Witnesses say the police overreacted. According to US Air (who else?) employees, it was all the passenger's fault. Now -- who are you going to believe?

    Let's see. A few weeks ago, in this Inquirer article, US Airways is struggling to hire baggage handlers, it was observed that "The baggage-return system in Philly has broken down again," and "[s]ervice here on some days became what some employees ruefully called "Christmas in July" . . . an allusion to the monumental baggage problems of the 2004 holiday season." Final hint:
    "When I went into the bag-claim office, I received the most nonchalant reception there," [passenger] Nancy Maclay said in an interview. "They were very flip. They didn't seem to care."
    Of course, this could have all been avoided if the passengers understood that "service" (as in customer service) is not part of the services offered at the baggage claim service office.

    Before travelling to/from Philly via its airport, this Philadelphia Magazine article, Terminal Illness: Lost baggage. No parking. Delayed flights. Perpetual lines. Oh, how we hate our airport. Here’s what needs to be done to fix it — and how to survive it in the meantime, is required reading. The Magazine's guide is needed because:

    Everything takes forever at the Philadelphia airport. You drive around forever looking for a parking space. You stand in security lines forever. If you haven’t caught breakfast and you’re flying out of Terminal E, you stand in the Burger King line forever and a half, and run to board your flight only to sit on the tarmac forever. If you bought your ticket a few days ago and it’s not to a Southwest city, it probably took you forever to find one that wasn’t hovering around $1,000, and it’ll probably take you forever to get there because your flight connects in two cities and will probably be delayed anyway, this being Philadelphia.

    All airports have issues, to be sure, but Philadelphia has a unique combination of every single possible issue an airport could have, to the point where you probably take fewer flights because of it. Corporate travel offices make fewer travel plans around here. The Convention Center gets fewer takers. A good airport can be a vital engine of economic development — Atlanta’s Hartsfield certainly has been, as have Phoenix’s Sky Harbor and Baltimore’s BWI — while a bad airport becomes a hugely symbolic microcosm of the city. . . . Philadelphia International is one of those airports only a native could love.

    Cartoon of the Day

    * Jeff Danziger, NY Times

    A Voice in the Wilderness


    Hey, Salt Lake City -- it's just not fair! Philly is the home of Rocky, so how did you end up with Mayor Rocky Anderson? He is the kind of Rocky that Philly could really use as Mayor.

    The Nation's article describes it best, The Mayor Who Challenged the President:

    The night before Salt Lake City Mayor Rocky Anderson hosted a crowd of several thousand protestors on the grounds of City Hall, Anderson's friend and advisor, the sculptor Steven Goldsmith, told me that the mayor was about to become "a folk hero of the American West."

    * * * *
    Anderson is surrounded by extremely intelligent, idealistic, and, it has to be said, adoring people. His administration has a sort of Camelot-in-the-Wasatch Mountains feel to it, a glamorous, energetic sense of possibility. In a city more known as the center of Mormonism than as a focal point for progressive politics, Anderson has instituted some of the most creative, thoughtful and radical urban policies anywhere in America. He has pushed to implement the Kyoto Protocols locally; has recreated the way in which city officials interact with their constituents; has restructured the city's criminal justice system; has gone out on a limb to defend gay rights; and has repeatedly taken on big developers, from "sprawl mall" advocates to those in favor of unregulated suburban growth in the large Salt Lake valley region surrounding the 182,000-strong city itself.

    * * * *
    Rocky's speech (everyone calls him just "Rocky"), Rocky's speech, now that was something else. It was orders of magnitude more powerful than any critique of Bush I've seen by an elected political figure, not so much because of his particular denunciations of Bush's Iraq policies, but because he synthesized sentiments about the whole way in which Bush governs and the nature of his relationship with the electorate.
    Norm Jenson of One Good Move has a series of excellent posts/videos on Mayor Rocky Anderson's protest during Bush's recent appearance in Salt Lake City. See, e.g., Mayor Rocky Anderson on Bush and Patriotism. In his speech, Rocky said:
    A patriot is a person who loves his or her country. Who among you loves your country so much that you have come here today to raise your voice out of deep concern for our nation--and for our world?

    And who among you loves your country so much that you insist that our nation's leaders tell us the truth?

    Let's hear it: "Give us the truth! Give us the truth! Give us the truth!"

    * * * *
    A patriot does not tell people who are intensely concerned about their country to just sit down and be quiet; to refrain from speaking out in the name of politeness or for the sake of being a good host; to show slavish, blind obedience and deference to a dishonest, war-mongering, human-rights-violating President.

    That is not a patriot. Rather, that person is a sycophant. That person is a member of a frightening culture of obedience--a culture where falling in line with authority is more important than choosing what is right, even if it is not easy, safe, or popular. And, I suspect, that person is afraid--afraid we are right, afraid of the truth (even to the point of denying it), afraid he or she has put in with an oppressive, inhumane regime that does not respect the laws and traditions of our country, and that history will rank as the worst presidency our nation has ever had to endure.

    * * * *

    This is a new day. We will not be silent. We will continue to raise our voices. We will bring others with us. We will grow and grow, regardless of political party--unified in our insistence upon the truth, upon peace-making, upon more humane treatment of our brothers and sisters around the world. . . . Let us keep in mind the injunction of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.: "Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter."

    Anderson's full speech is reprinted at Common Dreams, We Won't Be Quiet.

    Jenson also attended the protest and videotaped it, Impeach King George, which he posted with a great background song.*

    Finally, there's a segment by Keith Olbermann, who also interviewed the Mayor: Rocky With Keith. All well worth watching.

    I must admit that I was surprised that Salt Lake City was the site of this impressive stand against Bush's policies. Utah -- bastion of Bush Country -- actually has a few progressive souls? I've been to Salt Lake City and I would never have thought it (I guess my own biases are coming through). I'm more than happy to be proven wrong.

    * Jacob's Ladder ( see Peace Not War: Chumbawamba) written as part of the 'Not In Our Name' project.