The Case For a 'No' Vote on Roberts

Like Paul Krugman at the NYT, E. J. Dionne at the Washington Post almost always puts things in the right perspective for me. He did it again with, The Case For a 'No' Vote on Roberts

I have to admit that I have been mostly ignoring the Roberts' hearings. Basically, I believe that he knows exactly what he needs to do - look pretty and say nothing - and he's done an excellent job with that, so he's going to be confirmed. Knowing that, why waste my time watching (or reading) nothing. But Dionne does explain the danger in that (not that it will matter at all).